Adidas America, Inc et al v. Payless Shoesource, Inc. Featured Case

Plaintiff: Adidas America, Inc and Adidas Solomon, AG
Defendant: Payless Shoesource, Inc.
Case Number: three:2001cv01655
Filed: November 8, 2001
Courtroom: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office: Portland Office
County: Multnomah
Presiding Gauge: Garr Yard. Rex
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Activity: fifteen U.Southward.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The post-obit documents for this case are available for you lot to view or download:

Engagement Filed Document Text
February 9, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 1035 Opinion AND Guild. adidas' Movement for Attorneys' Fees and Expenses and Prejudgment Interest (#975) is denied. adidas' Beak of Costs (#971) is granted in part. I award costs in the amount of $380,596.84. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 02/06/09 by Approximate Garr Thou. King.Associated Cases: 3:01-cv-01655-KI, 3:03-cv-01116-KI (pvh)
Nov eight, 2001 Filing i

Complaint (Trademark & Merchandise Dress Infringement, Trademark & Trade Dress Dilution, Unfair Contest, Deceptive Merchandise Practices and Breach of Contract) Demand FOR JURY TRIAL Filing Fee collected. Receipt #: 440738 issued Summons issued as to Payless Shoesource, Inc.. Filed by Adidas America, Inc, Adidas-Solomon, AG against Payless Shoesource, Inc.. (mja, ) Boosted attachment(southward) added on 5/4/2006 (pvh, ).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to admission additional information nigh this case on the United states Courtroom'due south PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this instance on the Oregon District Courtroom'southward Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

  • Search for Party Aliases
  • Associated Cases
  • Attorneys
  • Instance File Location
  • Instance Summary
  • Docket Report
  • History/Documents
  • Parties
  • Related Transactions
  • Check Condition

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor practise they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Data Online?